In our opinion, such an approach ...

In our opinion, such an approach is a progressive step towards the recognition and enforcement of absolute priority subjects of the system (physician and patient). Unfortunately, in what the authors of the legal system model is constructed and justified on the basis not of the essence of relationships, and from the classical structure of the system and is represented in the form of certain levels (subsystems): the subsystem of Health at the federal level, subsystem-level health of the Russian Federation, sub-health level of municipal formations. In addition, the authors point out and is separated investigate a system of compulsory medical insurance and the operation of private health institutions. Unfortunately, this methodological approach initially is the health care system as structured in form rather than substance and can not remove the many contradictions in the construction of a logically acceptable solid legal model. As shown by the study of literary sources, relying on the same principle that encloses the basis of its structure, forming the essence, built many well-known typology of health systems. So MGField [2] in terms of socio-political structure of society conventionally identifies five types of health systems: 1) classic (unordered), 2) pluralistic, and 3) insurance, 4) national, 5) socialist. M. Fotaki [3] considers a modern health system, based on the category of countries assigned to different levels of social development. Thus, divided into the following models: 1) Universalist (Beveridge model), 2) social insurance (Bismarck model), 3) "southern model" (Spain, Portugal, Greece and Italy partially), 4) institutional or social-democratic "Scandinavian model ", 5) liberal (residual social security), 6) a conservative corporate (Japan) 7) Latin American, 8) health industrialized nations of East Asia, 9) health systems of countries with economies in transition. Closest to the essence of relationships in health care approach Shchepin OP, Filatov VB, J. D. Pogorelov et al [4], offering to distinguish three major types of health systems: a) utilitarian, b) kommunotarnuyu in) liberal, in line with how Zharkovich G. et al [5] determines the public value "prosperous society." In our opinion, the modern approach to the typology of health systems, initially to dominate the legal characteristics of the universal relationship between doctor and patient, in turn, certain fundamental (constitutional) freedom of the individual. Adequate to these freedoms modern model health care system, described and enclosed in a legal "wrapper" should be built exactly according to a principled approach. The way of the original finding of progressive legal definitions within the conservative forms of the health system and its subsystems - the research will inevitably lead to a dead end idea.