Begs the logical conclusion ...

This leads to the logical conclusion that the functions of licensing, accreditation and certification, as parts of a unified system of standards in health care, appear generally to be withdrawn from departmental systems. In areas where licensed - Accrediting Commission are structurally independent individuals - it would be rational to consider an extension of their functions and activities in all possible areas of standardization in health care. Also undisputed is that the efficiency standards, in particular, the level of the base and frame the health care system would be much more efficient to carry out her non-departmental independent body. Speaking about the standardization of technologies, we must bear in mind that the introduction and application of technological standards (technology) means, firstly, a high degree of formalization of medical work, secondly, requires professional skills and production discipline in the use of standardized technologies, third potentially allows for objective monitoring and identify deviations. Implemented a system of standardization in health care potentially can dramatically highlight the shortcomings of the functioning of a particular medical institution activity, both at the leadership level, and concrete specialist. Practice shows that there are objective prerequisites kind of inter-resistance to a system of standardization of medical practice. This is confirmed by the fact that, in particular, health authorities in the field do not show sufficient activity in the implementation of forms and methods of standardization, even a certain directive: execution of the order of formation of MH system of standardization in the industry wants the best. Special mention should be to perform the functions of control input standards. This function is closely connected with the measurement (Qualimetry). It is clear that the model system of standardization in healthcare is not conceivable without the control functions for the implementation, implementation and compliance with standards at the level of any subject of standardization. In our opinion, these functions confer authority, implementation of standards, not quite logical: do not confuse legitimate function of implementing and monitoring a single structure. Monitoring functions of medical practice, as is known, currently provides a system of intra-and extra-departmental expertise. Concrete work on qualimetry (Dimension), recommended to use standard, the success could be implemented by experts of the system and intra-departmental review of quality of care (EKMP), which, incidentally, to a certain extent, they are now doing. Summarizing the data qualimetry in health care, on the one hand, it can get kind of indicator system of standardization, on the other hand, these indicators can serve as (a legally binding box) criteria of the deviations from the standards. Standardization body, receiving feedback on the implementation of standards, will provide analytical work efficiency standards and develop recommendations for their improvement.