With the approval of that social ...

With the assertion that the social status of the patient plays a decisive role in the relationship with his physician, agree 69% of respondents in the number of patients, while 14% disagree. Physicians in this proposition is more conservative: half the respondents (50%) reject the influence of social factors on such relationships, almost as many (47%) support such a direct relationship. We asked about the impact on patient welfare by granting him a more high-quality medical services. The vast majority of patients (84%) and health workers (80%) believe that the welfare of patients plays a role in getting them better medical care. So do not believe 20% of health workers and only 8% of patients. The rest are undecided in their attitude. It is of interest correlated these data with responses to the statement "The patient can always get high quality medical care, regardless of their welfare." Agreed to this only 26% of each group. 69% of respondents patients and 58% of health workers did not agree with these statements. What is interesting - 16% of physicians could not determine in its relation to the dependences. The study attempted to determine the presence or absence of relations between seller and buyer, the main actors of medicine in today's reality in the Soviet period. On the assertion that in a modern national health care relationship between doctor and patient are acquired against the seller and the buyer replied affirmatively 66% of patients and 49% of physicians. One-fifth of patients did not agree with such statement, and among health care workers share dissenting approaching consonants and 44%. The share of doubters higher in the patients (14% vs 6%). With the approval of that in the relationship between doctor and patient in the health system of the Soviet period are present against the seller and the buyer did not agree 80% of physicians and 54% of patients. Proportion of consonants was higher in patients (23%), and only 10% of health workers have confirmed this relationship in the past. Recent changes in the status of the patient's priority to protect their rights would inevitably lead to the transformation of paternalistic ("father") relationship in the paternal medicine. The extent of such priority has been given us in the statement "Patients and physicians in their relationship should have equal rights" and "In the relationship between doctor and patient, patient's rights must be paramount." By the first assertion, and patients and physicians were in solidarity: respectively 65% ??and 67% said yes, that is, agreed with the statement. By the second assertion of 59% advocated the priority of their rights. Their opinion was shared by 40% of physicians, and every second (52%) objected to the priority rights of the patient. Thus, generalizing the results of the study, one could argue that both patients and physicians when evaluating proposed judgments confirm the changes in their relationship towards economic conditionality.